Monday, June 14, 2010

We the People : Revision.

The pianist of one of my favorite bands has a sticker on his keyboard that reads “If you don’t vote, don’t complain”. As a citizen of the United States, you have a right to vote and in exercising that, you have an important role in your government. The true strength of a democracy lies in the hands of the people. We decide who represents us in making decisions on how this country, state, county, or town should be run. The constitution allows moderate flexibility that leads the degree of government role in our lives to be decided by the citizens. We are facing discrepancies about when we want the government to step in and when government should keep out. How big is too big? We are to decided, in the voting booth.

As a citizen of the United States, I am protected by a democracy that has persevered through 44 presidents, and 234 years. Upon my eighteen birthday I fill out a paper, send it in and I can vote. I can have a major effect in my government. Am I being naïve? How can one vote effect who becomes the next president? In the 1960 race, John F. Kennedy had a victory over Richard M. Nixon by just 0.1 of a percent. Still 0.1 is around 3,000 votes in a presidential election. Imagine if 3,000, some odd people decided they made no difference? We could face a very different outcome. Perhaps the impact of citizens not exercising their right is greater seen in local elections. My first voting experience was a few days ago at the school. I walked in, surprised there was no line at the two booths. The next day I checked the paper and just over 500 people had voted. That equates to the number of students in the 9th- 12th grades alone. Figuring they have two people eligible to vote in each household, you can see how a large percent of eligible voters did not. My dislike and complaining about the outcome is justified by my role; I voted, I tried, so I can complain all I want. However, if your name was not written down and you didn’t pull that curtain closed don’t come to me gloating or complaining.

We play an important role in all aspects of government. However, how involved do we want government in our lives? The media, especially the right wing, expresses concern about “Big Government”. When do we draw the line? The proposed “soda tax” in New York State, casually known as the ‘Fat Tax’ would add cost to sugary beverages. Many residents are out raged, not only are you utilizing the unspoken word “tax” but justifying it by saying, well sugary drinks are leading to obesity. Even if it is true who says government should charge you more in an attempt to control your diet. This proposed tax has many wondering if the line has been crossed. Historically, Americans have always had a fear of the government gaining too much power. The bill of rights was instated to protect citizens from that and more.

When it comes to government less is more. The less people rely on government, the more, rightfully so, they rely on themselves. Balancing the size of government has always been a touchy area, which I began to see in middle school. One drowsy post lunch social studies class, my teacher wrote one word on the board: laissez-faire. Well I sat right up; it just has a nice ring to it. The denotation wasn’t bad either. Merriam Webster defines laissez-faire as: a doctrine opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights". Basically, keep your big government hands off my money. The Stimulus packages we have heard so much about, have allowed weaker competitors to delay their falling from the market and many seem to have positively “bounced back”. Nevertheless, the greater impact of the governmental chokehold on these companies will show, and may have a grave economical blow.
It is not that simple to say government should keep out of the economic business of a nation all together.
Government is defined as the organization, machinery, or agency through which a political unit exercises authority and performs functions and which is usually classified according to the distribution of power within. Government must allocate goods and assure the safety and security of its citizens. Sometimes a small guiding hand must come from big brother.

It is easy to see why government would crave a dynamic role in the economy. Economic stability greatly correlates to political and national security. Without economic stability, a nation stands like a Jenga tower, each player be it international or internal is pulling out pegs, removing the very foundation and strength until it tumbles. The United States government should observe, like mother bird watches her baby open up its wings and fly, but be at the ready to catch it right before it hits the ground.

Words are powerful tools, just as I read that sticker and its point struck a chord. Many politicians hope that they can strike a chord with you. But, all is to no avail if no action is taken. In the West African proverb:
"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." Made famous by Theodore Roosevelt, as citizens of the United States our stick is our right to vote. Going unguarded will leave our nation vulnerable to corruption and instability. Think one vote doesn’t matter? Tell that to all people in the totalitarian nations or corrupt democracies. Carry your stick, your vote matters in the United States, let’s keep it that way.






Sources:
Numerous Guests who have visited our class.
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/closerace1.html
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/h/3828-new-york-soda-tax-dead-on-arrival
http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/quotes.htm

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

We the People

The pianist of one of my favorite bands has a sticker on his keyboard that reads “If you don’t vote, don’t complain”. As a citizen of the United States, you have a right to vote and in exercising that, you have an important role in your government. The true strength of a democracy lies in the hands of the people. We decide who represents us in making decisions on how this country, state, county or town should be run. As a citizen of the United States, I am protected by a democracy that has persevered through 44 presidents, and 234 years. Upon my eighteen birthday I fill out a paper, send it in and I can vote. I can have a major effect in my government. Am I being naïve? How can one vote effect who becomes the next president? In the 1960 race, John F. Kennedy had a victory over Richard M. Nixon by just 0.1 of a percent. Still 0.1 is around 3,000 votes in a presidential election. Imagine if 3,000, some odd people decided they made no difference? We could face a very different outcome. Perhaps the impact of citizens not exercising their right is greater seen in local elections. My first voting experience was a few days ago at the school. I walked in, surprised there was no line at the two booths. The next day I checked the paper and just over 500 people had voted. That equates to the number of students in the 9th- 12th grades alone. Figuring they have two people eligible to vote in each household, you can see how a large percent of eligible voters did not. My dislike and complaining about the outcome is justified by my role; I voted, I tried, so I can complain all I want. However, if your name was not written down and you didn’t pull that curtain closed don’t come to me gloating or complaining.

We play an important role in all aspects of government. However, how involved do we want government in our lives? The media, especially the right wing, expresses concern about “Big Government”. When do we draw the line? The proposed “soda tax” in New York State, casually known as the ‘Fat Tax’ would add cost to sugary beverages. Many residents are out raged, not only are you utilizing the unspoken word “tax” but justifying it by saying, well sugary drinks are leading to obesity. Even if it is true who says government should charge you more in an attempt to control your diet. This proposed tax has many wondering if the line has been crossed. Historically, Americans have always had a fear of the government gaining too much power. The bill of rights was instated to protect citizens from exactly that.

When it comes to government less is more. The less people rely on government, the more, rightfully so, they rely on themselves. The example that comes to mind is welfare. Understand, I am taking a firm anti-welfare stance to support my argument. Welfare has many facets to it I will leave to expound at another time. Welfare pays about two dollars more per hour than minimum wage. So instead of heading out into the job market, many people settle to accept welfare. Welfare is the ultimate government provided safety net. Lose your job and you will be paid by the government. I understand the hesitation some contemplate before accepting welfare, but the real turmoil comes after accepting it. Now you face the situation were many people are. The government has determined you need more than minimum wage to get by. Therefore, instead of raising minimum wage and encouraging welfare-ers to work, the government raises welfare increasing their role in the economy.

One drowsy post lunch social studies class, my teacher wrote one word on the board:
laissez-faire. Well I sat right up; it just has a nice ring to it. The denotation wasn’t bad either. Merriam Webster defines laissez-faire as: a doctrine opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights".Basically, keep your big government hands off my money. Pure capitalism thrives with laissez-faire (say it it’s fun). Competition in a free market allows a Darwinistic outlook, where the strong survive. Without government moderation of the economy, weaker bodies will fall out. The Stimulus packages we have heard so much about, have allowed weaker competitors to delay their falling from the market and many seem to have positively “bounced back”. Nevertheless, the greater impact of the governmental chokehold on these companies will show, and may have a grave economical blow.

Taking a step back, it is easy to see why government would crave a dynamic role in the economy. Economic stability greatly correlates to political and national security. Without economic stability, a nation stands like a Jenga tower, each player be it international or internal is pulling out pegs, removing the very foundation and strength until it tumbles. The United States democracy, like it or leave, flourishes on capitalism. Government should observe, like mother bird watches her baby open up its wings and fly.

Words are powerful tools, just as I read that sticker and its point struck a chord. Many politicians hope that they can strike a chord with you. But, all is to no avail if no action is taken. In the
West African proverb: "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." Made famous by Theodore Roosevelt, as citizens of the United States our stick is our right to vote. Going unguarded will leave our nation vulnerable to corruption and instability. Think one vote doesn’t matter? Tell that to all people in the totalitarian nations or corrupt democracies. Carry your stick, your vote matters in the United States, let’s keep it that way.






Sources:
Numerous Guests who have visited our class.
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/closerace1.html
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/h/3828-new-york-soda-tax-dead-on-arrival
http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/quotes.htm

Monday, February 22, 2010

Assalamu alaikum

Does security make you happier?
In Pakistan , you are greeted with a quick “may god bless you” , however you are always greeted. Everyone on the street says “Assalamu alaikum
” to everyone they pass. As Americans, we view this as silly and time consuming. This polite action of greeting one another is not a fair representation of the population’s attitude.

The average housefly lives less than 30 days, Imagine planning your life knowing you had only one month to live. The people of Pakistan live like those houseflies not knowing if they will survive another year . A nation full of people living for themselves and only planning 5 to 6 months ahead, Pakistan is ridden with poverty and illiteracy.
Like a house without a roof, the Pakistan government provides the basis for security, yet it misses the mark and leaves the citizens vulnerable. Currently, Taliban forces have overrun a portion of the nation and the rest remains in continuous turmoil with constant threats from conflicting groups. Citizens of Pakistan walk in fear, bus burnings, riots, and other faces of death and destruction fill their environment and inhibit the growth of the nation.

To Americans this is unimaginable. From childhood, our outlook increases exponentially. Remember how far away Christmas used to seem?
My mom is already planning for next years, ten months away. We could not even consider that we may not be around in ten months. Therefore, we plan; big elaborate ideas, and often we incorporate relationships and positive mindsets. The United States government is a house, a mansion in fact, with a strong steady roof.
Consider however, those places in America where this may not hold true, I know there are locations I will never wander because this innate threat that paralyzes visitors and citizens. Every engineer knows there is room for improvement. No person, no building, no government is without it’s faults. The faults of the United States government do not limit the possibility of security. These crime ridden and dangerous locations can be avoided yes? Don’t live in Arbor Hill, don’t drive in downtown Schenectady. The United States government provides a security the Pakistan government does not, leaving Americans much happier in comparison.



Sources and Related Reading:
1.http://pkpolitics.com/2008/04/09/violence-in-karachi/
2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7570286.stm
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Pakistan
4. http://wintonbates.blogspot.com/2009/02/what-are-links-between-freedom-and.html
5. http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ny/albany/crime/



Sunday, January 3, 2010

Socially Secure?

In the past American saved every last cent to manage to get food on the table, with no knowledge of credit or cards. Now with many of us leaving above our means we swim in debt. With over $12,000,000,000,000(1) in national debt Americans still trust in the government to provide Social Security, viewed by many as a cushioned retirement fund.
Originally, Social Security was established to lessen poverty in retirement. Those paying into it still set up retirement funds, and Social Security was and is not intended to sustain the same standard of living as before receiving it. So why now as the baby boomer generation approaches retirement are so many dependent on this government program. The weakness of the Act is becoming ever present, it is predicted that by 2016 Social Security will be running a deficit.(2)
America's debt already weakens its appearance, now one of the government’s largest programs is wobbling on thin ice. Wise Americans already see this and have chosen to invest more heavily privately. A Minority fears, somewhat rightfully, the government is getting much too large. Not necessarily powerful as much as involved and overseeing. Lately the majority of citizens seem to be less weary of government than historically seen, however with the fragility of social security and other questioned policies that weariness seems to be increasing.
Our Constitution allows for the flexibility of trust and distrust, government to grow and shrink without abolishing it. It is this flexibility that will protect Americans, economically many charges will need to occur because of the inaccurate reliance on Social Security, but no complete revolution will need to be pursued.

Sources:
1.http://www.usdebtclock.org/#
2.http://www.socialsecurity.org/
3.http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1489760/the_beginning_of_social_security_and.html?cat=9
4.http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/22/obama-larry-summers-economy-government-opinions-contributors-social-security.html

Monday, November 9, 2009

Democray & Education : The Link

American students arrive at school promptly before the bell. Some slide into their seats just before the teacher turns to the class. That teacher turns to face the future lawyers, farmers, or engineers. The American standard of education promotes a line of equality though the plethora of jobs and opportunities to come from those sleepy eyed children.
Generations of Americans have been educated to a high standard and leave the security of the classroom equipped to battle political and social rhetoric. Citizens in democracies are much more engaged in political and social issues. The United States has put a large emphasis on educating all citizens; in other nations such as Egypt they have not. There are many downfalls to having a lower standard of education. Not only is progress in your nation hindered but literacy and political activism are negatively affected. A distinct riff arises from the varied education levels; the higher educated citizens see themselves as superior to the less or uneducated. In Egypt, the educated citizens have much more control in politics, while the less educated remain aloof opening the doors for corruption and manipulation.
The American standard of education leads to messier corruption. Blanton and easy corruption is eliminated when polices are controlled from varied levels of income, social standings, and education. Corruption still exists but the frequency is much lower than in other nations. Higher emphasis on education creates a more cohesive nation with diverse investors and a strengthened democracy.

Related And Sources:
Egypt Education
http://countrystudies.us/egypt/71.htm
Education provided backbone to stablilitize Argentina's democracy
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/want-a-stronger-democracy-invest-in-education/
Linking Education and Democracy

DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION by John Dewey
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/852/852-h/852-h.htm

Monday, October 26, 2009

Safety & Security

How do you judge the security of a nation? Does having tough stands on gun control promote security?
In the nation of Yemen ,which is fueled by tribal rivalries and hosts terrorist, The instability encourages a large percentage of the population to carry arms. Because of that, Many Americans would not feel "safe" walking the streets of Sana'a.
The tribal rivalries of Yemen have parallels in rural and urban American. Stark ethnic or gang alliances divide communities or schools. Somehow unarmed Americans still feel "safe" amid these tense rivalries. But are they? The government enforces gun control laws and in some cases buy back policies.
In New York, incentives like gift certificates to the mall encourage citizens to trade in arms. The government is positive acquiring these guns will cut back on crime. The coloration between arms and crime is blurred by society preference and seems to be all a factor of national policy.
So is America really safer because it has a smaller percent bearing arms or is Yemen actually just as or more secure?


NYS Gun Buy Back -
http://www.troyrecord.com/articles/2009/09/20/news/doc4ab5a609cf6b1252907792.txt
Civil/Tribal Wars in Yemen
http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/18/33294454/Updating-Yemeni- National-Unity-Could-Lingering-Regional-Divisions-Bring-Down-the-Regime
Anti-Yemen Gun
http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090814/FOREIGN/708139911/1135

Sunday, October 18, 2009

One Nation Under God

We often idealize the United States as one cohesive unit. To an extent this vision is true, however there are many differences and differences in our nation. We had a native to Yemen come speak to us on his country and attributes of it. Unfortunately, Yemen is infamous for the divisions that thrive there. The terrain and distracted government enables terrorist to seep into the nation's more deserted or elevated elements. With around 2% of the nation is land arable, most of the population is centralized into cities. leaving much of the nation unattended. 1

In the United States our divisions are closely guided by the constitutions; from legislators to PTA members we all abide by the ideas of our founding fathers and those in violation are brought to justice. The United States is too strong of a nation to have the magnitude of terrorist thrive within its borders. Terrorists do harbor in the United States, such as those involved in the Sears Tower incident.
2 So does our biggest threat comes from those in the mountains of the middle east or will these small homegrown terrorist become a much larger problem for the United States?

1.http://www.middleeastdirectory.com/cs_yemen.htm#Geo
2.http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-08-30-homegrown-terror-suspects_x.htm